Measuring affective well-being at work using short-form scales : implications for affective structures and participant instructions

Russell, Emma and Daniels, Kevin (2018) Measuring affective well-being at work using short-form scales : implications for affective structures and participant instructions. Human Relations, 71, pp. 1478-1507. ISSN (print) 0018-7267

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
Russell-E-39897-AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (550kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Data Supplements)
Russell-E-39897-AAM2.pdf - Supplemental Material

Download (345kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Russell-E-39897-VoR.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (262kB) | Preview

Abstract

Measuring affective well-being in organizational studies has become increasingly widespread, given its association with key work-performance and other markers of organizational functioning. As such, researchers and policy-makers need to be confident that well-being measures are valid, reliable and robust. To reduce the burden on participants in applied settings, short-form measures of affective well-being are proving popular. However, these scales are seldom validated as standalone, comprehensive measures in their own right. In this article, we used a short-form measure of affective well-being with 10 items: the Daniels five-factor measure of affective well-being (D-FAW). In Study 1, across six applied sample groups (N = 2624), we found that the factor structure of the short-form D-FAW is robust when issued as a standalone measure, and that it should be scored differently depending on the participant instruction used. When participant instructions focus on now or today, then affect is best represented by five discrete emotion factors. When participant instructions focus on the past week, then affect is best represented by two or three mood-based factors. In Study 2 (N = 39), we found good construct convergent validity of short-form D-FAW with another widely used scale (PANAS). Implications for the measurement and structure of affect are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Research Area: Business and management studies
Psychology
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Kingston Business School
Kingston Business School > Department of Management
Depositing User: Emma Russell
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2017 16:26
Last Modified: 01 Oct 2018 10:09
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717751034
URI: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/39897

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page