What aspects of intentional rounding work in hospital wards, for whom and in what circumstances? A realist evaluation protocol

Harris, Ruth, Sims, Sarah, Levenson, Ros, Gourlay, Stephen, Ross, Fiona, Davies, Nigel, Brearley, Sally, Favato, Giampiero and Grant, Robert (2017) What aspects of intentional rounding work in hospital wards, for whom and in what circumstances? A realist evaluation protocol. BMJ Open, 7(1), e014776. ISSN (online) 2044-6055

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
Ross-F-37229-VoR.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intentional rounding (IR) is a structured process whereby nurses in hospitals carry out regular checks, usually hourly, with individual patients using a standardised protocol to address issues of positioning, pain, personal needs and placement of items. The widespread implementation of IR across the UK has been driven by the recommendations of the Francis Inquiry although empirical evidence of its effectiveness is poor. This paper presents a protocol of a multimethod study using a realist evaluation approach to investigate the impact and effectiveness of IR in hospital wards on the organisation, delivery and experience of care from the perspective of patients, their family members and staff. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted in four phases. Phase 1: theory development using realist synthesis to generate hypotheses about what the mechanisms of IR may be, what particular groups may benefit most or least and what contextual factors might be important to its success or failure which will be tested in subsequent phases of the study. Phase 2: a national survey of all NHS acute trusts to explore how IR is implemented and supported across England. Phase 3: case studies to explore how IR is implemented 'on the ground', including individual interviews with patients, family members and staff, non-participant observation, retrieval of routinely collected patient outcomes and cost analysis. Phase 4: accumulative data analysis across the phases to scrutinise data for patterns of congruence and discordance and develop an overall evaluation of what aspects of IR work, for whom and in what circumstances. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by NHS South East Coast-Surrey Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be published in a wide range of outputs targeted at key audiences, including patient and carer organisations, nursing staff and healthcare managers.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) (project number 13/ 07/87).
Research Area: Health services research
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Faculty of Business and Law
Faculty of Business and Law > Kingston Business School (Accounting, Finance and Informatics) (from August 2013)
Faculty of Business and Law > Kingston Business School (Department of Management) (from August 2013)
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Fiona Ross
Date Deposited: 11 Jan 2017 13:19
Last Modified: 29 Aug 2017 12:39
URI: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/37229

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page