The UK vs Sweden : Is the NHS really so bad?

Lazaridis, Emmanuel N, Gavalova, Lucia, Jones, Simon, Quinn, Tom and Weston, Clive (2014) The UK vs Sweden : Is the NHS really so bad? PeerJ Preprints, ISSN (online) 2167-9843

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
Gavalova_L_35736_SV.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (136kB) | Preview

Abstract

Sheng-Chia Chung and colleagues report in The Lancet (23 January 2014) an international comparison of cardiovascular patient mortality between the UK and Sweden. They suggest that “more than 10000 deaths at 30 days would have been prevented or delayed had UK patients experienced the care of their Swedish counterparts.” Further, they estimate that 1741 deaths would have been prevented in the UK had the Swedish pattern of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and beta-blocker use been replicated in the NHS from 2004 to 2010. However, their study does not provide convincing evidence that faster uptake of primary PCI or beta-blockers on discharge would have had an effect on cardiovascular patient mortality in the UK.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: mortality, acute myocardial infarction, England, Wales, Sweden, comparison, confidence intervals
Research Area: Health services research
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education
Depositing User: Lucia Gavalova
Date Deposited: 29 Nov 2016 17:17
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2016 17:18
URI: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/35738

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page