Message

On Tuesday October 24th between 7am and 9am, we will carry out scheduled maintenance of the network. During this period of time, there may be potential outages, and the repository may be unavailable.

Thank you for your attention. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Survey to assess procedures for handling cytotoxic drugs in academic research laboratories in the United Kingdom

Sabbagh Dit Hawasli, Racha, Kayyali, Reem, Barton, Stephen, Osei-Barnieh, Georges and Nabhani-Gebara, Shereen (2016) Survey to assess procedures for handling cytotoxic drugs in academic research laboratories in the United Kingdom. American Journal Of Health-System Pharmacy, 73(1), e59-e62. ISSN (print) 1079-2082

Full text available as:
[img] Text
CARL survey AJHP Revised draft 3.docx - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (39kB)

Abstract

Purpose: The UK standard operating procedures mandate that trained pharmacists supervise the safe handling and preparation of hazardous drugs in healthcare settings. Researchers often handle cytotoxic drugs classified as hazardous in the laboratories of universities during their experiments, in the absence of special guidelines for these settings. The aim of this UK national survey is to gauge the current practice of cytotoxic handling in these cytotoxic academic research laboratories (CARLs). Methods: The survey used a 36-item online questionnaire targeting Health and Safety officers (H&SO) of academic institutions researching cytotoxic drugs. Invitations to participate in the survey, participant information sheets, and a link to complete the survey were all sent to the aforementioned officers. Results: 48.8% of H&SO (19/39) mentioned that the top two personnel groups that access the CARL are researchers and cleaning staff. Also, 48.8% of H&SO (19/39) disclosed that the latter are not aware of any special cleaning procedures required for these laboratories. 45.9% H&SO (17/37) reported that the staff at the reception point for cytotoxic drugs is neither aware of their risk nor notified of the content of the delivery. According to the H&SO, the required personal protective equipment in these laboratories was as follows; gloves (94.9%, 37/39), impermeable gown (59%, 23/39), mask (25.6%, 10/39), shoe cover (41%, 16/39), goggles (87.2%, 34/39). Conclusion: This audit reflects the repercussions of the lack of distinctive recommendations relating to cytotoxic manipulations in CARL. Professional pharmaceutical organizations are urged to set strategic plans to control unwanted cytotoxic contamination within academic institutions.

Item Type: Article
Research Area: Cancer studies
Health services research
Other laboratory based clinical subjects
Pharmacy
Statistics and operational research
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computing > School of Pharmacy and Chemistry
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Racha Sabbagh Dit Hawasli
Date Deposited: 12 Jan 2016 08:20
Last Modified: 12 Jan 2016 08:29
URI: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/32483

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page