Jones, Soraya, Simpson, Heidi and Ahmed, Hafez (2006) A comparison of two methods of blood pressure measurement. British Journal of Nursing, 15(17), pp. 948-951. ISSN (print) 0966-0461Full text not available from this archive.
In current practice, a two-stage approach to measuring blood pressure (BP) has been widely accepted as the most accurate and reliable method. However, by changing the local haemodynamics, this procedure might alter the blood pressure. In a study of 39 subjects, blood pressure was measured using two indirect methods (two-stage and one-stage approaches). Results showed no statistically significant difference in values for systolic blood pressure obtained from the two methods. Statistically significant lower diastolic blood pressure values were obtained using the two-stage compared to the one-stage approach. It is proposed that initial inflation of the cuff to estimate systolic blood pressure in the two-stage approach might lead to reactive hyperaemia and, therefore, a lower diastolic value. This two-stage approach might not provide the accurate readings it claims, and in addition it requires more time and subjects the patient to longer periods of stress.
|Research Area:||Nursing and midwifery|
|Faculty, School or Research Centre:||Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences (until 2013)|
|Depositing User:||Mark Brennan|
|Date Deposited:||22 Jul 2008|
|Last Modified:||16 Feb 2010 16:14|
Actions (Repository Editors)
|Item Control Page|