Truxal, Steven (2010) Agree to disagree: regulatory cooperation or hesitation in the EU and US. In: Society of Legal Scholars (SLS) Annual Conference 2010: Human Rights Act Ten Years On; 13 - 16 Sep 2010, Southampton, U.K. . (Submitted)
Full text not available from this archive.Abstract
A closer look at the European and American competition rules reveals two divergent regulatory approaches guided by the respective ethoi of ‘gentlemanly competition’ and ‘cowboy capitalism’. The resulting behaviours of the individual and the sector also promote varying conventionalities of business strategy. The increased momentum of globalisation and positive comity in environments of regulatory flux (deregulation, privatisation and re-regulation) engenders regulatory risk that policymakers will self-protect or protect competitors rather than competition, thereby confusing the ends of the rules with their means.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Event Title: | Society of Legal Scholars (SLS) Annual Conference 2010: Human Rights Act Ten Years On |
| Organising Body: | Society of Legal Scholars |
| Research Area: | Law |
| Faculty, School or Research Centre: | Faculty of Business and Law Faculty of Business and Law > Kingston Law School |
| Depositing User: | Steven Truxal |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Dec 2010 08:29 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Jan 2011 11:37 |
| URI: | http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/17752 |
Actions (Repository Editors)
 |
Item Control Page |