Concepts and action : where does the embodiment debate leave us?

Shipp, Nicholas J., Vallee-Tourangeau, Frederic and Anthony, Susan H. (2018) Concepts and action : where does the embodiment debate leave us? Psychology of Language and Communication, 22(1), pp. 260-280. ISSN (online) 2083-8506

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
Vallee-Tourangeau-F-41992-VoR.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (411kB) | Preview

Abstract

The behavioural evidence of sensorimotor activity during conceptual processing, along with that from neurological research, ignited the debate around the extent to which concept representations are embodied or amodal. Such evidence continues to fuel the debate but it is open to interpretation as being consistent with a variety of the theoretical positions and so it is possible that further, similar evidence may not lead to its resolution. In this paper we propose that independent value accrues from following this line of research through the enhanced understanding of the factors that influence agents’ conceptual processing of action and how this interacts with the agent’s goals in real environments. This approach is in line with broad principles of embodied cognition and is worthy of pursuit regardless of what the results may (or may not) tell us about conceptual representation.

Item Type: Article
Research Area: Psychology
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law, Social and Behavioural Sciences
Depositing User: Anna Englund
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2018 14:05
Last Modified: 01 Oct 2018 10:36
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0011
URI: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/41992

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page