Promoting physical activity in general practice: should prescribed exercise be free?

Tai, S S, Gould, M, Smith, P and Iliffe, S (1999) Promoting physical activity in general practice: should prescribed exercise be free? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 92, pp. 65-67. ISSN (print) 0141-0768

Full text not available from this archive.

Abstract

In the UK there are numerous schemes whereby general practitioners can prescribe exercise programmes, usually based in leisure centres. Of the factors that discourage adherence to such programmes in the USA, cost has proved important. We collected demographic and questionnaire data from 152 inner-London patients (108 women, 44 men) before they started an exercise programme on a National Health Service prescription, and analysed the results according to whether they dropped out of the programme (78%) or not. Use of logistic regression revealed only one previous barrier to exercise, 'not knowing about local exercise facilities', as a significant positive determinant of adherence (adjusted odds ratio 3.51, 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 11.86). For 'lack of money' patients were more likely to drop out of the programme (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.85). The very low cost of participation in this scheme, did not encourage adherence, particularly by those who had cited 'lack of money' as a previous barrier. The case of making prescribed exercise free or even low-cost remains unproven.

Item Type: Article
Research Area: Allied health professions and studies
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences (until 2013)
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Automatic Import Agent
Date Deposited: 21 Jan 2013 14:35
Last Modified: 21 Jan 2013 14:35
URI: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/14198

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page