On Tuesday October 24th between 7am and 9am, we will carry out scheduled maintenance of the network. During this period of time, there may be potential outages, and the repository may be unavailable.

Thank you for your attention. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Laruelle's 'criminally performative' thought : on doing and saying in non-philosophy

O Maoilearca, John (2015) Laruelle's 'criminally performative' thought : on doing and saying in non-philosophy. Performance Philosophy, pp. 161-167. ISSN (online) 2057-7176

Full text available as:
O Maoilearca-J-39265-VoR.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (342kB) | Preview


This essay argues that Laruelle’s ‘non-philosophical’ practice is connected to its performative language, such that to the question 'what is it to think?, non-philosophy responds that thinking is not “thought”, but performing, and that to perform is to clone the world. Non-philosophy is equally described by Laruelle as ‘transcendental practice’, an ‘immanent pragmatics’, or a ‘universal pragmatics’ that is ‘valid for ordinary language as well as for philosophy’. It is notable, however, that Laruelle objects to the focus on activity within the concept of a speech act, and instead emphasizes the ‘descriptive passivity’ that an immanent pragmatics obliges. Laruelle calls this a ‘Performed-Without-Performation’ which would be an action of the Real: philosophical language seen as a performed, but without a ‘we’ – or any others – performing (or ‘cloning’) it. It is this notion of the performative, without either active human or philosophical adumbration, which is the topic of this essay.

Item Type: Article
Research Area: Philosophy
Faculty, School or Research Centre: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences > School of Performance and Screen Studies
Depositing User: John Mullarkey
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2017 15:50
Last Modified: 03 Oct 2017 15:50

Actions (Repository Editors)

Item Control Page Item Control Page